|
International
Society
|
|
PREVIOUS
SPEAKERS:
Richard Ascough,
Senior Organiser/Legal Officer, GMB union
Peter Schofield,
Director of Employment and Legal Affairs, EEF
ILS, Annual Oxford Conference, 1o-12 September
2003
Title:
"Workshop: New Dispute Resolution procedures – a dog’s dinner?"
Are the new statutory minimum dispute resolution procedures
a ‘dog’s dinner’? Will they achieve their object? What benefits and disadvantages
do unions and employers see coming from the new rules?
As well as outlining the new rules, we hope in this workshop
to address these questions as well as raising questions about the interpretation
of the legislation and its application in practice.
If time permits, we shall consider issues arising from the
following:
- C believes her manager, R, has frequently been unfairly
critical of her work. She is particularly upset that he criticises her
work in front of colleagues. She believes that he has adopted this attitude
to her because she refused his repeated invitations to go for a drink
with him when she first joined his department. When she is late for
work one morning, R calls her to his office and gives her what he calls
a first and final warning for her unsatisfactory attitude to her work.
C is so upset at this that she leaves the office immediately after collecting
her belongings and writing a letter to R saying that she is resigning
with immediate effect because of his despicable behaviour towards her
and that ‘today was the last straw’.
After talking to a friend, C decides she is going to
bring a tribunal claim for constructive dismissal and sexual harassment
against her former employers.
C presents her claim to the tribunal and states on
it that she sent her employer a statement of her grievance on the day
she resigned.
- D was engaged by an employment agency to work for
W. She has continued to work at W for some time but throughout has been
paid by the agency. After an incident in which D was allegedly rude
to a customer of W, her engagement was terminated by the agency at the
request of W. D brings a tribunal claim for unfair dismissal and racial
discrimination against both W and the agency. Her claim refers to a
campaign of racial discrimination against her during her time at W.
D has not, at the time of presentation of her complaint, raised a grievance
under any procedure, whether W’s or the agency’s. Consider the application
of the dispute resolution procedures assuming (a) you act for D; (b)
you act for W.
Power Point presentation
(490 kb)
|